Schram et al - 1 EURO NCAP’S FIRST STEP TO ASSESS AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING (AEB) FOR VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
نویسندگان
چکیده
Following the implementation of AEB City and AEB Inter-Urban systems in Euro NCAP’s safety rating in 2014, a third type of AEB technology, Autonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users (AEB VRU), will be added to the overall assessment of new vehicles in 2016. The introduction of AEB VRU will be done in two phases where in 2016 AEB Pedestrian is implemented followed by AEB Cyclists in 2018. AEB VRU will be awarded as part of the assessment of Pedestrian Protection and represents the next step to improve the protection of vulnerable road users, complimentary to the existing subsystem tests to the vehicle front end. Following system tests in common pedestrian accident scenarios, more challenging and demanding cyclist scenarios are planned in a subsequent phase. In close corporation with the car industry represented by the ACEA, JAMA and KAMA associations, Euro NCAP has developed detailed test and assessment procedures for AEB Pedestrian. The procedures are based on the existing car to car AEB test and assessment protocols and validated and checked for repeatability and reproducibility at several Euro NCAP laboratories. This paper describes both the test and assessment protocols. BACKGROUND In 2009, Euro NCAP introduced the overall rating scheme, which allows new technologies to be implemented in the safety assessment of a new vehicle. The new rating scheme consists of four areas of assessment, also called boxes, which together result in a single overall safety rating. The four areas of assessment are Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), Child Occupant Protection (COP), Pedestrian Protection (PP) and Safety Assist (SA). Over the last few years, Euro NCAP has rapidly raised the requirements for better protection of vulnerable road users in the event of a crash which was seen to lag behind. After significant updates to the test and assessment protocols in the area of passive safety, the next logical step was to include the assessment of AEB systems. Due to the nature of pedestrian accidents with passenger cars, most AEB systems are only capable of mitigating these crashes and therefore, Euro NCAP considers these systems complementary to passive safety measures already in place. At the moment different AEB Pedestrian systems are already available on the market, based on radar, (stereo) camera or a combination of these sensors. The performance of these systems vary significantly based on the sensors used. The first generation of camera based systems typically switch off during low ambient lighting conditions as classification of pedestrians in darkness is not reliable enough. Euro NCAP has based its requirements for AEB Pedestrian systems on best practice to push for further development of these lifesaving technologies.
منابع مشابه
Autonomous Emergency Braking
If you've ever been involved in a crash you'll know just how traumatic, costly and inconvenient it can be for all involved. That's why at Thatcham we're determined to 'stop the crash' for the benefit of all road users and our experts believe that Autonomous Emergency Braking is the most important new technology we've seen to achieve these ambitious aims. Thatcham is a world renowned motor vehic...
متن کاملIntegrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking.
Pedestrian impact testing is used to provide information to the public about the relative level of protection provided by different vehicles to a struck pedestrian. Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is a relatively new technology that aims to reduce the impact speed of such crashes. It is expected that vehicles with AEB will pose less harm to pedestrians, and that the benefit will come about t...
متن کاملAutonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users
A simple, but realistic, model of an autonomous emergency brake (AEB) system was studied. Using Matlab, the model was applied to 543 car‐to‐pedestrian and 607 car‐to‐bicyclist real‐world collisions gathered from the highly detailed German In‐Depth Accident Study Pre‐Crash Matrix (GIDAS PCM) and weighted for representativeness. All collisions were to the front of the car. The aim was ...
متن کاملRoad to safe autonomy with data and formal reasoning
We present an overview of recently developed data-driven tools for safety analysis of autonomous vehicles and advanced driver assist systems. The core algorithms combine model-based, hybrid system reachability analysis with sensitivity analysis of components with unknown or inaccessible models. We illustrate the applicability of this approach with a new case study of emergency braking systems i...
متن کاملThe potential of autonomous emergency braking systems to mitigate
This paper details part of a research program conducted to examine the potential effect of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems on common crash types that involve a frontal collision. To accomplish this, simulations were conducted of 103 real world crashes. AEB system models with differing specifications were applied to these simulations to determine the change in impact speed that variou...
متن کامل